Document-Centric Orchestration and Deterministic Execution of Multi-Language Computational Workflows

Systems and methods for executing, orchestrating, and materializing computational workflows from document-based representations. Human-readable documents such as Markdown files carry the documentation, the executable logic, and the structured outputs as one artifact.

Date of record: Apr 16, 2026
Identifier: IFJ-2026W05VT33XP
Status: Published

The full document, with its publication date and indexing, sits on the disclosure register. Read the full disclosure.

Put this to work

Working fit brief

Decide whether this work fits a real operating problem, partnership, license, or build.

For: Practitioners, researchers, founders, and operating leaders.
What you keep: A working fit brief you can review, revise, and send.
What counts as sound: Answers a named decision
Separates evidence from assumptions
Includes the strongest contrary case
Names missing evidence
Ends with a test, owner, and date

A promising fit still needs evidence from the intended setting.

Nothing entered here is stored or sent. Review the prompt before sharing confidential, personal, patient, or privileged information.

The caseName the organization, setting, product, or piece of work without including confidential information.The decisionWhat must someone decide, and who owns that decision?Evidence in handList records, observations, measurements, rights, or prior work that can be checked.What is still unknownName missing evidence, disputed assumptions, and practical constraints.

Review the prompt

Working fit brief 1.0

PURPOSE
Decide whether this work fits a real operating problem, partnership, license, or build.

CONTEXT
The case: Not provided
The decision: Not provided
Evidence in hand: Not provided
What is still unknown: Not provided

METHOD
1. Name the problem and intended result.
2. Identify the relevant part of the work.
3. List evidence, access, and rights needed.
4. Name the smallest useful engagement.
5. Set the next decision.

TASK
Use the method below to produce a Working fit brief.

RULES
Separate facts, inferences, assumptions, estimates, hypotheses, and unknowns. Do not invent evidence, performance, rights, customers, economics, or regulatory standing. Quote or link the source for material facts. State uncertainty. Name what would disprove the conclusion. End with the smallest credible test, an owner, a decision date, and a stop condition.

A SOUND ANSWER
- Answers a named decision
- Separates evidence from assumptions
- Includes the strongest contrary case
- Names missing evidence
- Ends with a test, owner, and date

CAUTION
A promising fit still needs evidence from the intended setting.

You can leave any field blank. The prompt will mark it as not provided.

If the record survives your review, send the question, evidence, unknowns, and requested next step.

Discuss a working fit Intellectual Frontiers on LinkedIn

Back to defensive disclosures