Research area
Continuous Care Orchestration
Care-management software built as a system of record with alerting attached cannot be configured into a judgment system. The binding constraint has moved from data capture to judgment at scale: deciding hour by hour, across thousands of patients, which small signals deserve a person's attention today. This area studies the architecture, safety model, economics and adoption path of systems that reason continuously about care work while it is happening, covering graduated machine autonomy, evidence and provenance as first-class artifacts, simulation as an operating tool, program-fit reasoning across CCM, APCM, PCM, RPM, RTM, TCM and AWV, and migration away from incumbent platforms.
- Date of record
- Not recorded
- Identifier
- Not assigned
- Status
- Not recorded
Research under this area
Active · 14 notes
Zero Dashboard Experiences
The dashboard is an artifact of software that could not reason. When a system can rank, explain and justify, the correct interface is a briefing, a ranked stream of judgment calls and a conversational explorer, not KPI tiles, module sidebars and worklists. This pillar documents what replaces the dashboard and what it costs to give one up.