iCoDE June 22, 2022 Steering Committee Meeting Summary Report

Published in Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology on 2022-08-29.

Andrea M. Yeung; Jingtong Huang; David C. Klonoff; Randi E. Seigel; Julian M. Goldman; Shahid N. Shah; Sarah D. Corathers; Alaina P. Vidmar; Maurice Tut; Juan C. Espinoza

Read the paper at the publisher (DOI 10.1177/19322968221119146)

Summary, written here

The publisher lists no abstract for this article. This summary is ours, written from the article itself.

A meeting report from the iCoDE project, which is writing the standard for getting continuous glucose monitor data into the electronic health record. The June 22, 2022 steering committee reviewed progress from six working groups.

Working Group 1 set out a conceptual framework with a definition of CGMs, clinical modes of action, a data type classification, and core and expanded datasets manufacturers should expose. Working Group 2 covered account linkage between patient data and EHR records, cybersecurity standards for manufacturers, and identifiers for linkage. Working Group 3, co-chaired by Shahid N. Shah, recommended a FHIR-first strategy with HL7 v2.x where FHIR does not fit, a pull rather than push approach, and a middleware or staging environment for reconciliation, data quality checks, and high-resolution data rather than doing that work inside the EHR.

Working Group 4 addressed representation and visualization, treating the ambulatory glucose profile and its metrics as the standard elements. Working Group 5 proposed clinical workflows with roles and checklists. Working Group 6 wrote a project guide covering partnership types, financial considerations for health care organizations, and integration timelines.

Put this to work

Finding application record

Test whether the published finding applies in another setting.

For: Practitioners, researchers, founders, and operating leaders.
What you keep: A finding application record you can review, revise, and send.
What counts as sound: Answers a named decision
Separates evidence from assumptions
Includes the strongest contrary case
Names missing evidence
Ends with a test, owner, and date

Read the published paper and its limits before acting on the result.

Nothing entered here is stored or sent. Review the prompt before sharing confidential, personal, patient, or privileged information.

The caseName the organization, setting, product, or piece of work without including confidential information.The decisionWhat must someone decide, and who owns that decision?Evidence in handList records, observations, measurements, rights, or prior work that can be checked.What is still unknownName missing evidence, disputed assumptions, and practical constraints.

Review the prompt

Finding application record 1.0

PURPOSE
Test whether the published finding applies in another setting.

CONTEXT
The case: Not provided
The decision: Not provided
Evidence in hand: Not provided
What is still unknown: Not provided

METHOD
1. State the finding being used.
2. Compare the original setting with yours.
3. List evidence that transfers and evidence that does not.
4. Name alternative explanations.
5. Define a replication or application test.

TASK
Use the method below to produce a Finding application record.

RULES
Separate facts, inferences, assumptions, estimates, hypotheses, and unknowns. Do not invent evidence, performance, rights, customers, economics, or regulatory standing. Quote or link the source for material facts. State uncertainty. Name what would disprove the conclusion. End with the smallest credible test, an owner, a decision date, and a stop condition.

A SOUND ANSWER
- Answers a named decision
- Separates evidence from assumptions
- Includes the strongest contrary case
- Names missing evidence
- Ends with a test, owner, and date

CAUTION
Read the published paper and its limits before acting on the result.

You can leave any field blank. The prompt will mark it as not provided.

If the record survives your review, send the question, evidence, unknowns, and requested next step.

Discuss a replication or application Intellectual Frontiers on LinkedIn