Intellectual Frontiers

Patterns

A register of the security theatre research program: what it tests, the evidence it uses, and the patterns it has found.

  • pattern

    Attach an outcome test to every security purchase

    Make a named production test a condition of acceptance and renewal. Run the attack behaviour, record what the control changed, and use the result in the buying decision.

    Under program The dangers of security theatre

  • pattern

    Score unknown as red

    Remove the not assessed category. A control whose effect has not been demonstrated is reported as failing until it is tested, which makes the verification backlog visible to the people who fund it.

    Under program The dangers of security theatre, Attack-and-recovery engineering

  • pattern

    Publish the demonstrated result beside the target

    Every recovery objective appears with the timed result of the last real restore and its date. Empty cells are the honest output for systems that have never been recovered.

    Under program Recovery as a first-class discipline

  • pattern

    Store the query, not the screenshot

    Keep the source, collection time, and query with the result so a reader can reproduce it. The same record is ready when an audit begins.

    Under program Compliant Insecurity, GRC engineering

  • pattern

    Replace remembered behaviour with system behaviour

    For each thing staff are asked to remember, look for an arrangement that makes the unsafe action impossible, expensive, or automatically reversible. Keep training for the judgment that genuinely cannot be designed out.

    Under program Human error without human blame

  • pattern

    Rehearse the out-of-hours call

    Exercise every critical vendor escalation path on a schedule and record who answered and how long it took. An unexercised path is unknown, and unknown is red.

    Under program Vendor and supply-chain resilience

  • pattern

    Machine prepares, human decides

    Automate correlation, reconstruction, testing, and evidence assembly. Keep isolation, disclosure, notification, and risk acceptance with named people, and let authority move only as measured performance supports it.

    Under program AI-native defensive security

  • anti-pattern

    Reporting agent coverage as security posture

    A coverage percentage measures software installation. It carries no information about whether anything is detected, contained, or recovered, and it rises fastest on the systems that matter least.

    Under program The dangers of security theatre

  • anti-pattern

    Treating training completion as a control

    Completion is an attendance record. Where a technical control could prevent or detect the failure, training is a supplement to it, not a substitute for it.

    Under program Human error without human blame

  • anti-pattern

    Reporting backup job success as recoverability

    A finished job says the data was copied. Recoverability is demonstrated by a timed restore into a clean environment that the business accepts.

    Under program Recovery as a first-class discipline

  • anti-pattern

    Our vendor handles that

    This answer leaves out what the vendor sees and what it may do. Ask for the data received, the detections in place, the permitted actions, and the date the response path was last tested.

    Under program Vendor and supply-chain resilience

  • anti-pattern

    Presenting a certificate as evidence of resilience

    A report describes a negotiated scope, at a point in time, against selected controls, many of which ask only whether a process exists. It is a procurement artifact and a requirement source.

    Under program Compliant Insecurity

  • anti-pattern

    Writing a narrative where no data source exists

    Requirements with no operational evidence source produce prose, and prose always passes. The absence never appears as a failure in any report.

    Under program Compliant Insecurity, GRC engineering

  • anti-pattern

    Accepting a fluent AI report as an assessment

    A polished report can sound surer than the facts allow. Require a source record for every generated claim so the reader can check it.

    Under program AI-native defensive security

  • anti-pattern

    Treating the privacy notice as a description of the systems

    The notice states intent. Field inventories, access logs, retention queries, and deletion tests state practice. Where they disagree, the systems are the fact.

    Under program The dangers of data privacy theatre

Back to Zero Security Theatre · Experiments · Evidence · Patterns