Acceptance Evidence Record template
The chapter “Keep an Acceptance Evidence Record for Every Test That Informs a Decision” explains the fields. Skip the record if the test would not change a decision.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
Record ID and date |
|
Versions: product, message, pricing when relevant, ICP |
|
Actor and path stage |
|
Hypothesis (in full), with refutation rule |
|
Expected behavior |
|
Observed behavior |
|
Qualitative evidence: quotes, notes, recordings |
|
Quantitative evidence, with denominators |
|
Interventions: every rescue, by category and actor |
|
Failure and its type: where the path broke, and whether the cause was a defect in the software or a failed assumption |
|
Possible explanation |
|
Competing explanation |
|
Confidence, with a reason |
|
Required change: the smallest change the evidence supports |
|
Retest criteria |
|
Source and provenance: who ran it, where the data is, whether AI drafted or summarized any part |
A completed example (illustrative)
| Field | Entry |
|---|---|
Record ID and date |
AER-014, 2026-10-12 |
Versions |
Product 4.2, message v3, pricing v2, ICP v2 |
Actor and path stage |
Practice manager, setup |
Hypothesis |
A practice manager at a twelve-physician group completes setup from the ad, with the practice’s own scheduling data and no rescue, in one working day. Refuted if five or more of twelve stall. |
Expected behavior |
Setup in under a day; first intake in under five minutes. |
Observed behavior |
Setup took three days. The first intake took eleven minutes on day four. |
Interventions |
Setup rescue by customer success, six hours, unplanned. |
Failure and its type |
The path broke at the schedule export. Failed assumption: the practice knew to export first. |
Competing explanation |
This practice’s schedule data was unusually messy. |
Confidence |
Low: one of a planned twelve practices. |
Required change |
Change the claim to “ready in one week” and build the import step. |
Retest criteria |
The import step ships, or the claim changes again. |
Confidence levels
-
Low: a single test, or known confounders that were not ruled out.
-
Medium: repeated observations in a small or narrow sample.
-
High: consistent results across several segments and conditions.
Write the reason next to the level. “Medium” alone says nothing.