Keep One Page per Test That Informs a Decision So the Next Person Can Use It

Acceptance Evidence Record template

Companion to The Product Manager’s New Job Is Acceptance · Updated 2026-09-30

The chapter “Keep an Acceptance Evidence Record for Every Test That Informs a Decision” explains the fields. Skip the record if the test would not change a decision.

FieldYour entry
Record ID and date
Versions: product, message, pricing when relevant, ICP
Actor and path stage
Hypothesis (in full), with refutation rule
Expected behavior
Observed behavior
Qualitative evidence: quotes, notes, recordings
Quantitative evidence, with denominators
Interventions: every rescue, by category and actor
Failure and its type: where the path broke, and whether the cause was a defect in the software or a failed assumption
Possible explanation
Competing explanation
Confidence, with a reason
Required change: the smallest change the evidence supports
Retest criteria
Source and provenance: who ran it, where the data is, whether AI drafted or summarized any part

A completed example (illustrative)

FieldEntry
Record ID and dateAER-014, 2026-10-12
VersionsProduct 4.2, message v3, pricing v2, ICP v2
Actor and path stagePractice manager, setup
HypothesisA practice manager at a twelve-physician group completes setup from the ad, with the practice’s own scheduling data and no rescue, in one working day. Refuted if five or more of twelve stall.
Expected behaviorSetup in under a day; first intake in under five minutes.
Observed behaviorSetup took three days. The first intake took eleven minutes on day four.
InterventionsSetup rescue by customer success, six hours, unplanned.
Failure and its typeThe path broke at the schedule export. Failed assumption: the practice knew to export first.
Competing explanationThis practice’s schedule data was unusually messy.
ConfidenceLow: one of a planned twelve practices.
Required changeChange the claim to “ready in one week” and build the import step.
Retest criteriaThe import step ships, or the claim changes again.

Confidence levels

  • Low: a single test, or known confounders that were not ruled out.
  • Medium: repeated observations in a small or narrow sample.
  • High: consistent results across several segments and conditions.

Write the reason next to the level. “Medium” alone says nothing.

Download