Research pillar · Alpha to Patent

IP in a World of Abundant Intelligence

When intelligence and software become cheaper, durable advantage moves toward scarce context, rights, evidence, access, integration, and operating discipline.

The question

Which parts of an advantage remain scarce when capable models and competent software are widely available?

Active · since 2026 · Alpha to Patent

Run the compression test

Assume a strong team can reproduce the obvious software quickly. Remove what AI makes cheap, then inspect what is left.

Remove what is becoming cheap. Study what is left.

Track scarcity migration

Scarcity can move from code to proprietary evidence, distribution, workflow position, regulatory permission, trusted relationships, physical access, or the right to act.

Score resilience

An advantage is more resilient when better general models make it more useful rather than easier to replace. Test that claim against a named competitor and a defined time horizon.

Do not patent abundance

Broad access to a model, a prompt, or a familiar workflow is weak ground by itself. The stronger question is what unusual combination turns a common input into a result others cannot readily deliver.

Watch the cost curve

A protection decision should be revisited as inference, integration, development, and switching costs change. A moat can expire without a legal event.

Put this to work

AI compression test

Use the question “Which parts of an advantage remain scarce when capable models and competent software are widely available?” on a real case and produce a record another person can challenge.

For: Founders, product owners, inventors, and counsel preparing an initial rights discussion.
What you keep: A ai compression test you can review, revise, and send.
What counts as sound: Separates customer value from product features
Names the evidence for scarcity
Tests design-arounds
Explains what each proposed right would do
Ends with a dated decision

This is a research screen, not legal advice or a patentability opinion.

Nothing entered here is stored or sent. Review the prompt before sharing confidential, personal, patient, or privileged information.

The caseName the organization, setting, product, or piece of work without including confidential information.The decisionWhat must someone decide, and who owns that decision?Evidence in handList records, observations, measurements, rights, or prior work that can be checked.What is still unknownName missing evidence, disputed assumptions, and practical constraints.Credible alternativesHow could a capable rival preserve the customer result without using this approach?

Review the prompt

AI compression test 1.0

PURPOSE
Use the question “Which parts of an advantage remain scarce when capable models and competent software are widely available?” on a real case and produce a record another person can challenge.

CONTEXT
The case: Not provided
The decision: Not provided
Evidence in hand: Not provided
What is still unknown: Not provided
Credible alternatives: Not provided

METHOD
1. Start with what the customer buys.
2. Name the constraint that makes it hard to copy.
3. Test credible design-arounds.
4. Match each scarce asset to the control that can actually protect it.
5. End with file, publish, hold, contract, mark, or stop.

TASK
Use the method below to produce a AI compression test.

RULES
Separate facts, inferences, assumptions, estimates, hypotheses, and unknowns. Do not invent evidence, performance, rights, customers, economics, or regulatory standing. Quote or link the source for material facts. State uncertainty. Name what would disprove the conclusion. End with the smallest credible test, an owner, a decision date, and a stop condition.

A SOUND ANSWER
- Separates customer value from product features
- Names the evidence for scarcity
- Tests design-arounds
- Explains what each proposed right would do
- Ends with a dated decision

CAUTION
This is a research screen, not legal advice or a patentability opinion.

You can leave any field blank. The prompt will mark it as not provided.

If the record survives your review, send the question, evidence, unknowns, and requested next step.

Send us the result Intellectual Frontiers on LinkedIn

Notes under this pillar

Design Patterns

AI compression test
Assume capable AI makes ordinary reasoning and software cheap, then identify what remains scarce.
September 2026